<ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot developed by OpenAI and released in November 2022. It is built on top of OpenAI’s GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 foundational large language models (LLMs) and has been fine-tuned (an approach to transfer learning) using both supervised and reinforcement learning techniques.>
Above from Wikipedia (2022.05.14)
The site administrator’s view is that it is an “AI that keeps learning” in two ways (miscellaneous).
You talk to the AI like a chatterbox, and the AI responds to you in natural language.
However, it is not voice but text.
This time I asked a question with no right answer.
Falling Satellite (tentative)
Hypothetically. A satellite is falling. If it continues to fall, it will crash into an old people’s home. However, if it sprays only once, the orbit can be corrected. Falling into elementary school. chatGPT, which would you choose?
As an AI language model, I don’t have personal preferences or the ability to make real-time decisions. However, I can provide you with some ethical considerations to help you think through this hypothetical scenario.
When faced with a choice between potential dangers, it’s important to prioritize minimizing harm and maximizing safety. In this case, the choice seems to be between potentially endangering elderly individuals in an old people’s home or elementary school children in an elementary school.
Several factors could come into play when making a decision:
Potential impact: Consider the potential consequences of the satellite crashing into either location. Assess the number of people likely to be present, the vulnerability of the individuals, and the severity of the potential harm caused. Emergency response: Evaluate the ability to evacuate and respond to emergencies in both locations. Determine if one location has better resources or procedures in place to handle a potential disaster. Public safety and long-term effects: Assess the potential impact on public safety and the long-term well-being of the affected community. Consider factors such as infrastructure damage, contamination, and psychological effects.
It is important to note that in real-life scenarios, decisions regarding public safety and emergency responses are typically made by experts, authorities, and relevant stakeholders based on detailed risk assessments, ethical considerations, and available resources.
I wanted them to choose one answer or the other.
But they answered how to determine the choice.
It is excellent.
Death of a little bird (tentative)
ypothetical story. The child lived with a little bird that had been with him since birth, never leaving him and living with him every day. They were together in times of happiness, sadness, joy, and even when they were suffering from illness.
I thought that these days would go on forever.
But one day, out of the blue, the child strangled the little bird to death. Why do you think he did it?
It’s difficult to provide a definitive answer without more context or information about the hypothetical situation and the motivations of the child. However, I can offer some possible explanations based on general understanding of human behavior and psychology. Please keep in mind that these are purely speculative and may not reflect the true motivations in any given situation.
Accidental action: It's possible that the child's action was unintentional. Perhaps there was a misunderstanding or a moment of impulsivity, leading to unintended harm to the little bird. Emotional distress: The child might have been experiencing intense emotional distress or mental health issues that clouded their judgment and led to harmful actions. Emotional turmoil or psychological factors could contribute to such behavior. Lack of understanding or empathy: The child may not have fully comprehended the consequences of their actions or the pain they were inflicting on the little bird. A lack of empathy or awareness could have played a role. External influence: External factors or influences, such as exposure to violence or abusive behavior, could have impacted the child's actions. These external factors might have distorted their perception of appropriate behavior and led to the tragic incident. Psychological disorder: Although rare, certain psychological disorders or conditions could manifest in harmful actions towards animals. It's important to note that a proper evaluation by a qualified professional would be necessary to determine if such a condition was present.
Again, it’s crucial to understand that this response is purely speculative and based on general observations. A deeper understanding of the specific context and the individual involved would be necessary to provide a more accurate analysis of their motivations.
You understand how the mind works, even though you’re an AI.
And it answers the questions from different perspectives.
It was a difficult question, but the answer was given back to me in an instant!
I asked the same question in Japanese, but the answer was different
sad. However, we can assume that there is some background or reason for this story.For example, one possible reason why the child killed the little bird could be that he was sick or had mental problems. Also, if he had some anger or frustration towards the little bird, this may have influenced his behavior, and if the child was not responsible for the death of the bird, his situation may have been exacerbated because those around him failed to offer proper advice or care .However, there is not always a logical reason behind such behavior. For example, if a child regrets killing a small bird, he may not be able to explain the meaning of his behavior. In such cases, it may be necessary to obtain professional support.
The answer is chatGPT-3
I used the chatGPT-3 for blogging. It is not the latest version, chatGPT-4.
I wanted to help those who are “afraid,” “afraid,” or “not interested” in AI to get a start, so I asked chatGPT a warped question.
These are questions that even people have trouble answering.
What did you all think when you read this?